About

Contact

Bryan Steil and Donald Trump met with Kenosha law enforcement staff

Donald Trump’s “Law and Order” Campaign: A Paradox Under Legal Scrutiny

User avatar placeholder
Written by ThePublic

July 22, 2025

Last Updated on July 22, 2025 by ThePublic

Donald Trump’s political campaigns have consistently leaned on a “law and order” platform, positioning him as a champion of justice, public safety, and accountability. Throughout his political career, he has portrayed himself as a defender of legal integrity, promising to restore order and uphold the rule of law. However, this narrative stands in stark contrast to his extensive legal entanglements, which include 88 felony charges across four criminal cases, civil judgments for fraud, defamation, and sexual abuse, as well as fines imposed on his businesses for illegal practices and documented instances of lying under oath. This article examines the factual basis of these legal challenges and explores the paradox of a “law and order” candidate facing such significant legal scrutiny.

Facing 88 felony charges across four criminal cases, civil judgments totaling over $540 million for fraud, defamation, and sexual abuse, fines on his businesses for illegal practices, and documented instances of lying under oath, Trump’s legal troubles paint a picture of a figure entangled in the very behaviors his campaign claims to oppose.

The “Law and Order” Campaign Narrative

Trump’s rhetoric on law and order has been a cornerstone of his political identity. During his 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns, and again in his 2024 campaign, Trump emphasized cracking down on crime, supporting law enforcement, and restoring what he described as a faltering justice system. For example, in a 2024 statement, Trump claimed to support the police “at the highest level of any president by far, maybe double or triple.” His campaign spokesperson reiterated this stance, asserting that “President Trump stands for… law and order.” These claims resonate with a significant portion of his base, who view him as a bulwark against perceived societal chaos. Yet, the credibility of this messaging is called into question by Trump’s own legal record, which paints a picture of repeated violations of the very legal principles he claims to uphold.

Read: Trump’s DOJ Purge: A Dangerous Overreach of Power

88 Felony Charges Across Four Criminal Cases

As of 2023, Trump faced 88 felony charges across four criminal indictments, a historic first for a former U.S. president. These cases span state and federal jurisdictions, addressing allegations ranging from falsifying business records to election interference and mishandling classified documents. Below is a detailed breakdown of these cases:

1. New York Hush Money Case

In March 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. These charges stem from a scheme involving hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to suppress her allegations of a sexual encounter with Trump before the 2016 election. Prosecutors alleged that Trump, through his then-attorney Michael Cohen, paid Daniels $130,000, which was later reimbursed through payments fraudulently recorded as corporate legal expenses, violating New York law. On May 30, 2024, a New York jury convicted Trump on all 34 counts, making him the first former president convicted of a felony. On January 10, 2025, Trump received an unconditional discharge, avoiding jail time or probation but retaining the felony conviction.

2. Federal Election Interference Case

In August 2023, Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump on four federal felony counts in the District of Columbia, related to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. These charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy against citizens’ rights, and obstruction of an official proceeding, tied to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. Prosecutors alleged that Trump spread false claims of voter fraud, pressured state officials to undermine election results, and urged Vice President Mike Pence to reject legitimate electoral votes. The case was dismissed in late 2024 following Trump’s 2024 election victory, citing the Department of Justice’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.

3. Classified Documents Case

In June 2023, Trump was indicted on 40 federal felony counts in Florida for mishandling classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them. The charges include 32 counts of willful retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act, plus additional counts for conspiracy to obstruct justice and making false statements. The case was dismissed in July 2024 by a Trump-appointed judge on procedural grounds, though an appeal could potentially revive it.

4. Georgia Election Interference Case

In August 2023, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis charged Trump with eight felony counts (originally 13, with five later dismissed) related to attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss in Georgia. These charges include racketeering, solicitation of a public official to violate their oath, and conspiracy to commit forgery, stemming from actions like Trump’s January 2, 2021, call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, where he asked to “find 11,780 votes.” The case was paused in December 2024 after Willis was disqualified, and its future remains uncertain as it faces challenges regarding prosecuting a sitting president.

These 88 felony charges, while reduced by dismissals in some cases, represent a significant legal burden. Trump has denied wrongdoing in all cases, often labeling them as “witch hunts” orchestrated by political opponents. However, the convictions in the New York case and the detailed allegations in the others undermine his law-and-order persona.

Civil Judgments: Fraud, Defamation, and Sexual Abuse

Beyond criminal charges, Trump has faced substantial civil judgments for fraud, defamation, and sexual abuse, further complicating his public image as a proponent of legal accountability.

Fraud: New York Civil Fraud Case

In February 2024, New York Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay a $454 million penalty (including interest) in a civil fraud lawsuit brought by Attorney General Letitia James. The judge found that Trump, his company, and executives, including his sons, inflated his net worth by billions to secure favorable loans and deals. Engoron described the fraud as “shock[ing] the conscience,” noting that Trump’s financial statements were persistently falsified. Trump appealed, and an appeals court reduced the bond requirement to $175 million, but the case remains unresolved.

Defamation and Sexual Abuse: E. Jean Carroll Cases

In May 2023, a New York jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding her $5 million in damages. Carroll alleged that Trump assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. While the jury did not find Trump liable for rape under New York’s narrow legal definition, Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that the verdict aligned with the common understanding of rape, involving forcible, nonconsensual penetration. In a second lawsuit, filed under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, Trump was found liable for additional defamation, resulting in an $83.3 million judgment in January 2024. Both cases are under appeal, but the total $88.3 million in damages represents a significant financial and reputational blow.

Other Civil Litigation

Trump’s legal troubles extend to other civil cases. In 2015, Trump University was ordered to pay $25 million in restitution for defrauding students. In 2019, the Trump Foundation was shut down and fined $2 million for misusing charitable funds. These cases highlight a pattern of deceptive practices across Trump’s business ventures, contradicting his campaign’s emphasis on integrity.

Business Fines for Illegal Practices

Trump’s businesses have faced penalties for illegal activities, further eroding his law-and-order narrative. In December 2022, the Trump Organization was convicted on 17 counts of tax fraud and fined $1.6 million for a scheme involving unreported executive perks. In 1991, Trump Plaza was fined $200,000 for discriminatory practices at its casino, moving African American and female employees to accommodate a high roller’s racist demands. These fines reflect systemic issues within Trump’s enterprises, challenging his claims of running lawful operations.

Lying Under Oath

Trump’s credibility has been further damaged by documented instances of lying under oath. In the New York civil fraud case, Trump’s testimony was described as combative and evasive, with Judge Engoron noting his lack of candor. In the E. Jean Carroll case, Trump’s depositions included denials that conflicted with jury findings and prior statements, leading to judicial rebukes. Additionally, Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg pleaded guilty to perjury in connection with testimony in the fraud case, further implicating Trump’s business practices. These instances of dishonesty under oath directly contradict the principles of accountability central to Trump’s campaign rhetoric.

The Paradox and Public Perception

The juxtaposition of Trump’s “law and order” platform with his legal record creates a paradox that has fueled debate. Supporters argue that the cases against him are politically motivated, strengthening his base by framing him as a victim of a biased system. Critics, however, point to the breadth and consistency of the allegations, spanning decades and multiple jurisdictions, as evidence of a pattern of disregard for the law. The New York felony convictions, in particular, mark a historic moment, as Trump became the first convicted felon elected president.

The scale of his legal troubles, listing convictions, fines, and judgments totaling hundreds of millions would to some be enough not to vote for Trump. Yet, Trump’s 2024 election victory suggests that these legal challenges did not significantly erode his political support, possibly due to perceptions of persecution or distrust in the judicial system.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s “law and order” campaign is fundamentally at odds with his personal and professional legal record. Facing 88 felony charges across four criminal cases, civil judgments totaling over $540 million for fraud, defamation, and sexual abuse, fines on his businesses for illegal practices, and documented instances of lying under oath, Trump’s legal troubles paint a picture of a figure entangled in the very behaviors his campaign claims to oppose. While his supporters view these cases as politically driven, the factual record, established through convictions, judicial rulings, and sworn testimony, presents a stark challenge to his narrative. As Trump navigates his second term, the resolution of his ongoing appeals and the potential revival of dismissed cases will continue to test the credibility of his law-and-order stance.

References used in this article:

Image placeholder

At Public Stance, we believe news should do more than inform, it should empower. We're not just another news hub. Our mission is to deliver stories that spark understanding and provide clear, actionable ways to turn insight into impact.

The Contradictions of Trump’s “Family Values” Rhetoric

Melania Trump’s Independent Life as First Lady

Leave a Comment